NTT general calibration and validation process

 

 

The Nutrient Tracking Tool (NTT) uses the Agricultural Policy Extender (APEX) model to estimate nutrient and sediment losses as well as crop yields. APEX uses a combination of site specific data (crop management information, weather, soil and slope) and regionalized environmental parameters to estimate the results produced in NTT program. Simulations are usually done for >30 years and the main function of NTT to evaluate and compare different farm-management practices in order to minimize nutrient and sediment losses while economically optimize the crop production. However, in order to ensure that parameters used in APEX for the regional NTT simulation are appropriate the following tasks within each stage are taken:

 

 

Stage 1.     To obtain a general parameterization for each state/region, a series of NTT runs simulating common crop rotations, soils and, weather patterns for the region is done and the results are compared with expected crop yield and nutrient and sediment loss values obtained from National Agriculture Statistics Service, USDA (NASS 2017) .

 

 

Stage 2.     During this stage, the field-scale measured data from various sources (e.g., local measured studies and collaborators) are used to finalize the regional APEX parameters.

 

 

Stage 3.     The final parameters obtained from stage 2 will be used to repeat the process described in stage 1. However, the various conservation practices, common to the local region, are also simulated and evaluated for all soils and weather conditions during this stage.

 

 

Stage 4.     The final results are evaluated and presented to local stakeholders (if any) and collaborators. The results of the parameterization (for all stages) would be available on the NTT site.

 

 

 

 

STATE: SOUTH CAROLINA

 

Below are the results for South California statewide simulations of APEX using the parameters derived through a regional parameterization method (Stage 1). We display the average nutrient, sediment and water quantity results over all simulations.

 

Stage: 1

                                     

Type of parameterization: Regional only (no field-scale data available at this time)

Number of counties: ALL (46)

Number of Soils: 2754

Slope: 0-10%

Simulation Period: 1981-2015

Number of Scenarios: 4

Scenarios:

Table 1: Crop management scenarios

Rotation

Tillage Operation

Nutrient management

Corn

No till

Commercial

Cotton

No till

Commercial

Peanuts

No till

Commercial

Soybean

No till

Commercial

 

Table 2. Fertilizer Application

Rotation

Commercial Only

N (lb/ac)

P (lb/ac)

Corn

180

60

Cotton

60

60

Peanuts

20

40

Soybean

-

40

 

 

 

Summary of Results:

The results below are averaged over the 35 years simulation period.

A.   Crop Yield:

Table 3. Average crop yield for all crop management scenarios

 

Corn

(bu/ac)

Cotton

(lb/ac)

Peanuts

 (lb /ac)

Soybean

(bu /ac)

NTT

146

(113-160)*

910

(136-1339)

2808

(2667-3146)

33.34

(25.27-40.92)

NASS

127^

(N/A)

912#

(N/A)

2849

(1750-3900)

31.00 ª

(N/A)

*Range (Min – Max)

^ 2018 State Agriculture Overview, South Carolina (https://www.nass.usda.gov/Quick_Stats/Ag_Overview/stateOverview.php?state=SOUTH%20CAROLINA)

# Crop Production (May 2018), USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service

(https://www.parkdalemills.com/wp-content/uploads/cotton-data/PDFs/3400%20USDA%20Cotton%20Crop%20Production%2005-10-18.pdf)

a South Carolina County Estimates

(https://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/South_Carolina/Publications/County_Estimates/2017/SCSoybeans2017.pdf)

 

 

B.   Water Quantity:

Table 4. Annual average hydrologic components for each crop rotation

Rotation

Precipitation (in)

Evapotranspiration (in)

Surface Flow (in)

Corn

47.01

(40.66-58.78)*

19.21

(16.41-20.40)

21.32

(15.65-30.28)

Cotton

47.01

(40.66-58.78)

27.84

(15.36-32.19)

14.71

(10.33-22.99)

Peanuts

47.01

(40.66-58.78)

22.22

(17.88-24.72)

21.49

(14.59-33.07)

Soybean

47.01

(40.66-58.78)

22.15

(19.03-24.69)

19.14

(15.35-28.90)

*Range (Min – Max)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C.   Water Quality:

 

Table 5. Annual average nutrient and sediment loads for each crop rotation

Rotation

Organic N (lb/ac)

Organic P

(lb/ac)

Sediment (tons/ac)

Surface N

(lb/ac)

Surface P

(lb/ac)

Corn

2.45

(0.24-13.16)*

0.27

(0.03-2.10)

0.21

(0.01-1.24)

35.13

(15.94-67.50)

0.63

(0.35-0.98)

Cotton

12.76

(2.84-42.30)

2.27

(0.41-8.91)

1.41

(0.22-8.52)

21.32

(12.80-39.17)

0.62

(0.45-0.91)

Peanuts

11.23

(0.88-52.68)

3.27

(0.53-11.33)

1.52

(0.32-6.75)

21.82

(11.54-38.52)

1.27

(0.74-1.93)

Soybean

3.27

(0.49-19.40)

0.52

(0.07-3.98)

0.32

(0.03-2.70)

10.67

(4.65-29.01)

0.58

(0.41-0.85)

*Range (Min – Max)